'Anecdotals' Documentary



Individuals who have been harmed by COVID-19 pictures have suffered a spread of medical points — every little thing from demise and everlasting incapacity to pericarditis, nerve injury and overwhelming fatigue. Whereas their signs fluctuate, they share a number of frequent themes:

  • Abandonment — These injured by COVID-19 jabs have been largely deserted by the mainstream medical neighborhood and authorities.
  • Disgrace — Those that spoke out about their accidents have been shamed, ridiculed and labeled unethical; their medical points have been politicized, whereas society offers no empathy.
  • Hopelessness — With no applications in place to assist these injured by COVID-19 pictures, and plenty of medical doctors afraid to even acknowledge the shot’s connection to sufferers’ signs, a lot of these harmed really feel misplaced and do not know the place to show for assist.

Bringing consideration to the problem — and to the folks whose lives have modified drastically since receiving a COVID-19 shot — is step one to restoration. The movie “Anecdotals” does simply that, offering a glimpse into the lives of people that have suffered important hostile reactions from COVID-19 pictures.1

A lot of them have been instructed their tales do not matter. In any case, they’re simply anecdotes. However as you will see within the movie, their journeys must be heard, not solely to allow them to entry much-needed medical care but additionally so society turns into conscious of the true dangers of COVID-19 pictures which were coated up and censored.

Secrets and techniques From the Trials

One case entails Maddie de Garay, who was a wholesome 12-year-old when she signed up for Pfizer’s COVID-19 trial for 12- to 15-year-olds. She suffered a extreme systemic hostile response to her second dose of the shot, nonetheless, and struggled via 11 ER visits and 4 hospital admissions within the 12 months and a half that adopted.

Accidents from the shot have left her unable to stroll or eat — she receives her vitamin through a feeding tube — and affected by fixed ache, imaginative and prescient issues, tinnitus, allergic reactions and lack of neck management.2

As if the bodily trauma weren’t sufficient, Maddie and her household have been frequently dismissed by the medical professionals put in place to assist, ignored by the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration and denied the care wanted to assist Maddie. However the first crimson flag, Maddie’s mom Stephanie mentioned at a listening to, was the best way the trial was arrange within the first place.3

Individuals got entry to the TrialMax app to document unintended effects, like a swollen arm, however de Garay was stunned on the format it used. There wasn’t area for open-ended feedback, solely direct questions with “sure” or “no” choices for solutions, or test containers to indicate a set of predetermined potential results.4 She defined:5

“I simply need to give all people somewhat higher concept of what occurred in our trial, as a result of I didn’t know if you enter the trial, all people makes use of a trial app. The app solely permits you to document solicited hostile occasions — fever, redness, gentle, reasonable.

There is no free kind to fill in another response that you’ve. What it’s a must to do, when you’ve got another kind of hostile occasion, is it’s a must to name this examine physician. This leaves a variety of room for human error and concern of reporting bias coming from the principal investigator.”

In Pfizer’s April 2021 disclosure of Maddie’s case to the FDA, it is acknowledged solely that she had stomach ache:6

“One participant skilled an SAE [serious adverse event] reported as generalized neuralgia, and in addition reported 3 concurrent non-serious AEs (stomach ache, abscess, gastritis) and 1 concurrent SAE (constipation) inside the similar week. The participant was finally identified with purposeful stomach ache. The occasion was reported as ongoing on the time of the cutoff date.”

Then, a day earlier than Pfizer submitted their request for emergency approval of the COVID-19 shot for 12- to 15-year-olds to the FDA, they added purposeful neurological dysfunction as a prognosis in Maddie’s chart.7 Her mom famous within the movie:8

“By the information lower off for the trial, Maddie skilled over 35 hostile occasions. None of those have been talked about … Maddie was within the hospital when the EUA [emergency use authorization] was accredited. I believed that Maddie can be in the perfect palms attainable within the uncommon probability she has a extreme response. That was not the case. They did every little thing of their energy to cover every little thing. Neither Pfizer, the FDA or the CDC has ever talked to us.”

Pfizer Trial ‘Like Nothing I’ve Ever Seen’

Whereas well being companies proceed to guarantee the general public that COVID-19 pictures are secure, these working carefully on the trials had a special take. “I used to be engaged on Pfizer’s trial,” Brooke Jackson, a regional director previously employed by Pfizer subcontractor Ventavia Analysis Group, which was testing Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, mentioned within the movie.9 “What I noticed was like nothing I’ve ever seen earlier than.”

She witnessed falsified information, unblinded sufferers, inadequately skilled vaccinators and lack of correct follow-up on hostile occasions that have been reported. After notifying Ventavia about her issues repeatedly, she made a criticism to the FDA instantly — and was fired the identical day.10 In her phrases:11

“The velocity by which they have been enrolling within the examine — 4 to 5 coordinators pushing via 40, 50, 60 sufferers a day. We weren’t storing the vaccine at its acceptable temperature, the failures in reporting critical hostile occasions. We had so many stories of hostile occasions … we simply couldn’t sustain. The examine physician signed a bodily examination when he wasn’t even in clinic.

Then Ventavia had unblinded each affected person that was randomized within the trial. After we introduced it to their consideration, that is what we have been instructed to do — take away the proof and destroy it. Emails about mislabeled blood specimens per Pfizer’s protocol, we must always have instantly stopped enrolling, however they by no means instructed Pfizer.

I’d convey the issues to my managers and it was, ‘We’re understaffed.’ The FDA, they solely see what Pfizer provides them. So I used to be documenting all of this. And on the twenty fifth of September, I went on to the FDA, and about six and a half hours later, I misplaced my job. I used to be fired.”

The FDA and Pfizer tried to cover the COVID-19 shot medical trial information for 75 years, however the FDA was ordered by the U.S. District Courtroom for the Northern District of Texas to launch redacted variations of trial paperwork on a a lot quicker schedule. As a part of the court docket order, 80,000 pages of paperwork associated to the FDA’s approval of Pfizer’s COVID-19 pictures have been launched June 1, 2022.12

Amongst these paperwork have been case report varieties (CRFs) revealing that deaths and extreme hostile occasions passed off throughout Part 3 trials, however, as reported by Kids’s Well being Protection, Pfizer had “a development of classifying virtually all hostile occasions — and particularly extreme hostile occasions (SAEs) — as being ‘not associated’ to the vaccine.”13 Journalist Naomi Wolf defined:14

“We have got these superb 2,500 volunteers — extremely credentialed medical researchers, medical doctors and nurses — pouring over these 55,000 paperwork {that a} court docket order pressured Pfizer and the FDA to launch.

Effectively, they’re discovering that there have been horrible harms — deaths, spontaneous abortions, neurological issues, fainting, coronary heart injury, debilitating muscle ache, debilitating joint ache — that have been hid by Pfizer and the FDA from the American folks.”

Opposed Reactions — Actual, Not Uncommon

The movie particulars hostile reactions which have stolen careers, independence and the flexibility to operate usually in day by day life from numerous folks. Dr. Joel Wallskog, a former orthopedic surgeon, shared his story after getting the shot:15

“My life has dramatically modified after this hostile response. My profession of 19 years, that I took virtually 14 years to coach for, is probably going over. I am simply not secure to work as an orthopedic surgeon. Assuming the FDA and the CDC can be alarmed at my prognosis, I anticipated to be contacted quickly after my VAERS [Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System] submission. No telephone name, no contact.”

Kellai Rodriguez additionally detailed her struggles since receiving a COVID-19 shot:16

“I misplaced my skill to talk naturally. I’ve turn into unable to stroll with out a walker, and by no means know if or when the tremors will come or go. I can now not cook dinner, clear and even choose up and maintain my child for too lengthy, earlier than my physique begins to shake uncontrollably or is thrown into excruciating quantities of ache.

I’ve seen numerous ER medical doctors in addition to two neurologists who’ve given me no prognosis, no additional testing apart from common bloodwork, CT scans, ECGs, EKGs and an MRI, all of which the medical doctors instructed me got here again regular.”

At a rally for these injured by the pictures, a whole lot got here collectively to share their experiences, with hanging similarities. Many suffered from tremors that left them unable to stroll, with onsets inside days of receiving the pictures. Within the hospital, nurses shared that different sufferers have been experiencing comparable signs, however medical doctors refused to label the circumstances shot-related. Jennifer Bridges, a former nurse with Houston Methodist Hospital, who was fired for not getting the shot, defined:17

“I’ve seen emails, the place hospitals threatened their medical doctors — you can not signal medical exemptions, you can not speak about, you can not report hostile reactions to those vaccines. And if someone was really courageous sufficient to do this in writing, there have been different folks increased as much as erase these. I’ve the proof, and I’ve the those that have proven me this stuff.”

Tales Censored and Silenced

These injured by the pictures have been left deserted throughout shot mandates. The movie’s director, Jennifer Sharp, is amongst those that suffered from debilitating signs after the shot, together with facial numbness, electrical shock-like emotions and muscle weak spot. She opted to not get a second dose of the shot after experiencing the intense hostile occasions after the primary dose, and misplaced her job consequently:18

“In January 2022, I misplaced a job as a result of I wasn’t vaccinated. I had a VAX card displaying one shot, I had a blood check displaying that I nonetheless had antibodies and a physician’s exemption. And I used to be prepared to get examined every single day. They did not care. I could not go to eating places, gyms, malls, occasions.

So when the anti-mandate rally got here to Los Angeles, I attended it to signify these of us who have been all of the sudden societal outcasts only for doing what the federal government requested us to do. Even in the event you essentially disagree with another person’s stance, does that justify the shortage of compassion for them dropping their livelihoods?”

But, when these affected tried to talk out about their experiences, they have been silenced and shunned. One girl who was injured by the pictures shared:19

“We’re being so censored that we won’t get the message out that we’re even being censored, as a result of if it is via social media, they’re one of many platforms that’s censoring us. And even when it isn’t outwardly, we’re being shadow banned …

So you could possibly share one thing, however no one acknowledges it. And also you’re pondering, ‘Oh, I am remoted, I am alone,’ however they’re most likely not seeing it. It has been moved to the underside of the timeline or it isn’t in existence. You actually can not submit on social media about having a vaccine response with out it being censored.”

When Sharp determined to movie “Anecdotals,” she made a pitch video that she shared privately on the platform Vimeo. It described her response to the shot and the necessity for compassion. “It was eliminated for misinformation. They mentioned they do not permit content material that goes towards the CDC suggestions. I’m not allowed to inform my very own story,” she mentioned.20

Suicides As a consequence of COVID-19 Shot Reactions

Brianne Dressen, cofounder of React10, a nonprofit providing monetary and different help to these affected by long-term hostile occasions from COVID-19 pictures, detailed a number of suicides amongst victims affected by electrical shocks, neuropathy, tinnitus, tremors and different results from the pictures. She additionally thought of suicide attributable to hostile results she suffered after collaborating within the AstraZeneca trial:21

“I do not suppose folks notice how debilitating the signs are. My husband could not go away me alone for months. He’d go away the home and he did not know if he was going to return dwelling to a spouse that was alive. He was afraid, each second of every single day, and it seeps into our youngsters’ lives.

Six months, I used to be not mother, I used to be not a human. I used to be simply going to drive all the way down to the lake. And I used to be going to carbon monoxide my automotive. And I used to be gonna put AstraZeneca did this on an indication within the window. And I used to be too sick to do it. So solely cause I am alive is as a result of I used to be too sick to do it. And I want to end with a letter from a buddy, Bree:

‘I can not take this any longer. This has taken every little thing away from me, my profession, my household, my life, my physique is not going to cease attacking itself. And that is past the worst quantity of torture. Please settle for my apologies. I need to bid farewell to this world. Please be certain that the world is aware of the cruelty that has been imposed upon us. Goodbye, my expensive buddy, I’ll see you on the flip aspect.’

Rochelle Walensky. Janet Woodcock, Peter Marks, Anthony Fauci, you erased her and the various others like her, their blood is in your palms. You can’t convey my pals again. However it can save you others from their destiny. In case you lastly simply inform the reality.”

The movie requires an open dialogue and a motion from humanity to ask the tough questions and acknowledge those that are struggling attributable to COVID-19 pictures. “We have to be seen, believed and helped,” Sharp mentioned. “Our tales are anecdotal, however in a scenario the place the science is altering, the research are flawed and political agendas regulate, anecdotes might fairly presumably be essentially the most dependable information that we’ve. Sure, we’re anecdotal. And these are our tales.”22



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here